Lol, now that you've stated your position, I feel like I was trolled. Essentially, your position boils down to the belief that every individual in a society has the right to forcibly resist the collective will of that society when they choose. The only limitation is that the person must feel "railroaded" or that an "injustice" has been done.
Initially, let's recall that you brought up this thread because you were appalled at the use of force by the police. But the very thing that is supposed to restrain police officers -- the law -- is what you claim an individual can ignore when they feel they've been railroaded/an injustice has been done. So you're complaining that the police aren't following the law, yet you openly advocate that ordinary citizens can break the law when they choose. But, somehow, the police are wrong when they do this and the citizen that breaks the law somehow becomes a patriot.
Your position itself is so absurd that only a cursory review is required to expose it's superficial nature. The "rule of law" is just a fancy way of saying that our laws, our legal structure, is designed to take competing interest and conflict and provide a forum where conflicts can be resolved peaceably. Phrases such as "due process" simply mean that the rules of have to be fair for everyone. But, a part of this, also means that when I get a court decision in my favor -- it must be respected.
By choosing to adopt a position where you can simply ignore a court order after you lose, you essentially infringe on other people's rights and simultaneously undermine one of the necessary components of a democracy (rule of law). Because each individual has the right to due process of law they are entitled to see their victories in court enforced. Obviously, society could not survive if each individual retained some sort to forcibly resist, or just ignore, the directives of that society. So yours is more of a selfish position -- although you say that everyone has the right to resist lawful orders, you don't really mean that.
What you really believe is that only people that think and believe as you do have the right to resist lawful orders. You complain that Cesar Fucking Chavez doesn't have the right to interfere with a court order deporting 100 illegal immigrants. You actually complain that it's a HORRIBLE! comparison. But it's not. Because as you've stated, every person has the right to resist a lawful court order. Cesar Fucking Chavez then has every right to block the deportation of those illegal aliens.
Your only retort is that illegal immigrants don't pay taxes (which is false, btw. They pay a great deal of taxes.) But even assuming that your statement was accurate, it is a distinction without a difference. You claimed that everyone has the right to resist a lawful court order. Individuals can only be deported after a court issues a lawful court order (many choose to self-deport without a court order however). But let's say you later restrict it to "citizens" only, wouldn't a U.S. citizen then have the right to block that bus until they release those illegal immigrants? If Jefe and Maria run across the border and spit out a kid, can't that kid block the bus in 20 years when they try and deport his parents? Yes, according to you. I could do the same. Change the example slightly.. you said that if someone tried to seize your guns, you'd refuse to turn them over. Let's say I've got 100 illegals in my house. When the cops knock on my door, I won't turn them over either.
Don't get caught up on the examples. They are too easy to identify. Get drilled by a drunk driver? I'm sure he's going to feel pretty "railroaded" when he has to pay for your medical. Thank God he can just say, "no." I only tried to imagine some scenario that would offend your political sensibilities.
And a pet peeve of mine is this new trend that you see within the TP movement, where these individuals have convinced themselves that they are the second coming of the "founding fathers." Comparing these hillbilly, white trash motherfuckers to men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams is a fucking joke. Jesus Christ, are you going to take the TP elites of Palin and Cruz and compare them to Franklin, Jefferson, and Adams?
At the end of the day, there's nothing here to discuss. It's not a serious position.
