Sonya]
These are called time/place/manner restrictions. They are not unusual.
I am quite familiar with the restrictions. I think anyone is that's had any legal training at all. I'm absolutely certain that I don't have to tell you that these restrictions have to narrowly constructed to achieve a compelling government interest. AND The law must be content neutral, not vague, and still allow for protestors to broadcast their message, in some form.
Also, you're the lawyer not me, but aren't these restrictions reserved solely for local governments? I question how federal agents would possess the jurisdiction to come into a state and start arbitrarily enforcing such restrictions on the first amendment without any statutes or local ordinances supporting such action. Am I wrong about this?
