Yes I do have questions (continue avoid my posts though.. its cool & I'll continue to hit yours head on)
What makes the gathering of human's/earth's 'wastes' & turning those 'wastes' into valued resources not economically feasible?
- I mean.. yes I understand that to recycle a plastic water bottle is more expensive than to make a new plastic water bottle.. but that doesn't mean we don't recycle because the economics just don't 'add up'. When it comes to the survival of mankind, this planet, etc.. you can put economics aside.. just like, as all of mankind, if we wanted to provide unlimited energy for mankind we could do it.. just take the economics out of it & it easily happens. Recycling is currently done 'at a loss' but we took the economics out of it because its clearly the 'right thing to do'
What science do you have that makes it so that I cannot make something that already floats.. float?
- The USS GEORGE H.W. BUSH Aircraft carrier weighs in at 100,000 tons.. moves at 30 knots on the water.. & is a self sustaining floating city. Clearly science doesn't make it possible to do such feats & such a thing does not exist.. but for science lets go ahead & do a home experiment. Fill your sink with water.. place an empty plastic bottle on the water.. does it float?
Yeah I know you didn't have the cap on & it sank proving me wrong right? LOL
What makes my concept not socially feasible?
- Are you saying the cleaning up & the care of our oceans not something all mankind should be tackling? Socially hell yes.. but more important; actually physically addressing this issue..
