What point are you trying to make? Right now it seems that you're just throwing out random slogans/historical facts and hoping that someone else will connect the dots for you.
Ok I'll try to connect my dots:
The constitution is fragile. The 7th Amendment protects us from round-ups, but it didn't stop the round-up of the Japanese during WW2. It did not end up in their extermination, but it did leave an astounding precedent; the government can suspend parts of the constitution as they see fit.
Quote:
if you're wrongfully arrested here, you have the right to due process, even to the point of filing a civil suit against the government and seeking monetary relief.
Assuming the cops don't beat you to death (not to say they all would), that's a protection that we take for granted because of the 7th amendment, did you know that the US can hold a terrorist indefinitely? How hard would it be to label a group of people as terrorists, the Branch Davidians come to mind.
The video asks the question, 'when is it ok to shoot a cop?' Is the answer really 'never?' I whole-heartedly disagree that it's never ok to kill a cop, as much as I whole-heartedly disagree that it's never ok to kill an American Soldier. If our freedoms are in jeopardy I hope Americans will have the courage to stand together as the Ukrainians did and fight or die as free men. I hope it can be solved diplomatically instead of violently, but if the government crosses the threshold of acceptable malleability of the constitution and into tyranny then we'll have no other choice.
Plus I think it's healthy to think about this kind of stuff, at what point is this threshold? It's good to think about it or else people will wake up one day and wonder what happened.
