Libertarianism seems to resonate the most with military people in this country. I suppose it's a bit of a leftover 19th century ethos.
The problem with the video is this "when all else fails" concept. A cop wrongfully arresting a guy is, at least on paper, something we thought about already. The reason you don't have the legal right to violently resist cops over your personal perception of injustice is because you have a right to due process after he arrests you, and opinions, particularly legal ones, are like assholes. I'm not meaning to suggest it always works out that way, or even that the public is consciously consenting to the expansion of federal powers to the degree people who view this as a non-issue think. Everyone can point to the law they don't like, or the corrupt cop, or even argue that both of these are systemic problems. But framing individual resistance as some kind of civil uprising against tyranny is jumping the gun on a shitstorm almost nobody really wants if you ask them directly. Moreover, if the "sheep" as he so affectionately calls them, consciously or unconsciously approve, then who the fuck is he to complain?
I disagree with the premise, but I appreciate the sentiment. Our modern government flirts with civil liberties curtailments on occasion that look outright pre-Roman to me. The problem is our government always did that, hell I can think of ten occasions off the top of my head that were way worse than now.
