Any licensing test that can be administered by some fat rent-a-cop isn't going to be able to screen out everyone who might go full retard with their gun. If you want guns around, you're going to have to accept a certain amount of that. Particularly if guns are sexy and new where you live.

What makes me think this law isn't going to last is that they couldn't get around the challenge to the law without invoking its constitutionality. As far as I'm aware that's basically akin to waving your arms around and saying "overrule me". That said, I think to see if this really has a chance, you'd have to look at the opinions of the circuit courts in the other districts. If it's an apples to apples comparison of issues between all of them and they just flat out came up with a different answer to the same question, the law might stick around for a little while. If the 9th circuit just had shitty reasoning or a narrow construction of the issue, particularly when constitutionality is involved (courts will do absolutely anything to interpret a law as constitutional if at all possible), then don't expect this to hang around for long.

That said, if the actual opinion doesn't demand concealed carry, then this has nothing to do with concealed carry, they could just as easily interpret it to be really restrictive open carry.