Rainman]I would love to actually debate the substance of our argument, but I can't do that with you when you don't understand the basic principles of science. There is no point for me to even begin a debate when everything I am going to argue comes from scientific research and everything you are going to argue comes from hearsay and personal experience. My first reply was testing you to see if you were capable of research and intelligent argument. You failed, I never planned on going forward with anything else from there. I'll save my breath for people who know what design of experiment basics are.
You don't even know how to form a theory, and I'm not even sure you understand the basic principles of scientific theory.
How am I suppose to debate with somebody who says, "you cannot disprove a theory with another theory because they are both only theories". Seriously?
Everything you have said in all your posts about almost everything science related is wrong. Do not pass go, you collect nothing, we are all dumber for reading this entire thread. May god have mercy on your soul.
Blah blah blah, more insults, quote from a movie (Happy Gilmore).
Nothing of substance. Again.
If you've got something worthwhile to say, say it. If you want to prove your point via some sort of study do it. I'll attempt to counter with a study that refutes it. I told you this already.
Otherwise, you're once again just typing a whole bunch of words that still equals out to you not substantiating your point with anything of value at all.
You started it Rain. I'm 100% challenging you to actually back up your statements. You keep ducking me.
Bravo sir, well done!
