Listen you dumb motherfucker. If you want to continue to talk at the big boys table you're going to fucking pay attention.

We don't have time to explain shit to you 5 times in a row. Global warming data is not based off of this 1 group of scientists alone. There are thousands of independant (which means not related to these other morons).

EVERYTHING you have posted is in relation to that 1 group of corrupt climatologist (which nobody has any info on what data was actually corrupted yet, just assumptions). However, with science ALL OF THERE DATA MUST BE THROWN AWAY.

With all of their data gone, the thousands of other scientists still have enough information to verify global warming from human caused omission as a fact.

Quote:
Impossible, the raw data and methodology was not available, therefor part of the science process - (replication) is not possible. Real science is engaging, it is open for scrutiny.


You're just wrong. The raw data and methodology ARE AVAILABLE. I already stated this. There are thousands of organizations that independantly have their own data. This one extremely tiny group of scientists doesn't skew the work of thousands of unrelated scientists with unrelated data.

I already stated all of this shit. So why are you arguing weak ass points that have already been shot down.

You're holding onto that 1 fucking article about those scientists. Every other article you posted is commentary on that 1 fucking group of scientists.

This is what ignoramuses do when faced with facts. They hold onto the 1 paragraph that makes a little sense in their pea brained mind without looking at the thousands of other reports they are arguing against. They will search the entire internet for a youtube video of somebody backing up their side of the argument and post that shit, without doing any research on the person they are posting about.

Thanks for wasting my fucking time. You obviously never read anything I even posted previously.


P.S.- The "Dr" you posted about is a lobbyist for the largest oil\chemical production company in the world. You talk about people doing research for a paycheck and skewing their results, and then you intentionally post a video from a political lobbyist?