EE]The conversation is not over Rain. If you are having heating up of other planets at the same time the earth is warming up, that means there is another cause than humans doing it.
Human activities result in emissions of four long-lived GHGs:
CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and halocarbons (a group
of gases containing fluorine, chlorine or bromine). Atmospheric
concentrations of GHGs increase when emissions are larger than
removal processes.
Global atmospheric concentrations of CO2, CH4 and N2O
have increased markedly as a result of human activities
since 1750 and now far exceed pre-industrial values determined
from ice cores spanning many thousands of years. The atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and CH4
in 2005 exceed by far the natural range over the last
650,000
years. Global increases in CO2 concentrations are due primarily to fossil fuel use, with land-use change providing
another significant but smaller contribution. It is very likely
that the observed increase in CH4 concentration is predominantly due to agriculture and fossil fuel use. The increase in N2O concentration is primarily due to agriculture.
The global atmospheric concentration of CO2 increased from a
pre-industrial value of about 280ppm to 379ppm in 2005. The annual
CO2 concentration growth rate was larger during the last 10
years (1995-2005 average: 1.9ppm per year) than it has been since the beginning of continuous direct atmospheric measurements (1960-2005 average: 1.4ppm per year), although there is year-toyear variability in growth rates. {WGI 2.3, 7.3, SPM; WGIII 1.3}
The global atmospheric concentration of CH4 has increased from
a pre-industrial value of about 715ppb to 1732ppb in the early 1990s, and was 1774ppb in 2005. Growth rates have declined since the
early 1990s, consistent with total emissions (sum of anthropogenic
and natural sources) being nearly constant during this period. {WGI
2.3, 7.4, SPM}
The global atmospheric N2O concentration increased from a
pre-industrial value of about 270ppb to 319ppb in 2005. {WGI 2.3,
7.4, SPM}
Many halocarbons (including hydrofluorocarbons) have increased
from a near-zero pre-industrial background concentration,
primarily due to human activities. {WGI 2.3, SPM; SROC SPM}
There is very high confidence that the global average net
effect of human activities since 1750 has been one of warming,
with a radiative forcing of +1.6 [+0.6 to +2.4] W/m2
Do you think the worlds climate has been stable for the last 2 million years? No it has not. Its constantly changing, due to sun cycles, the tilt of our planet and volcanic activity just to name a few. Could humans me a partial cause, sure, I guess they could but Co2 is not as much of a green house gas compared to water vapor.
If you read what I just put above, it states that we have an understanding in the trends going back 650,000 years. Why are you talking about tilt, volcanics, etc... like scientists never thought of that shit, but EE on the internet cracked the code?
Read the fucking paper!! The info posted above was from a report that the copenhagen diagnosis cited. If you just fucking read it you wouldn't sound so fucking retarded.
My point is, we dont know enough about this planet
My point is we do.
we have groups of people, including governments who are in it for one thing and one thing only, MONEY. Dont tell me you dont have scientists who will fudge their work to get that next big grant because we both know there are.
There are probably lots of scientists who fudge their work for money. However, global warming is accepted by thousands of independent scientists. Every major nation's scientists have performed their own studies and come to the same conclusion. When was the last time that every single country in the world agreed on anything? Well all of their scientists do, are you going to tell me that this is the biggest conspiracy of all time?
READ THE REPORT
