No as I stated above, medical access should be nondiscriminatory as it is. The payment of the care is individual, as it should be.
Since we are talking about the bottom line, money. Is your argument that if you do not have money, you have a right to the fruit of another mans labor? Could you make this argument about food and shelter as well, being that they are more of a necessity than health care?
I think we can agree to disagree about what is fair and what is not. It is refreshing talking about the nuts and bolts of an ideology rather than partisan bickering.
