Quote:

We both know the groups which moralize legislation is the on right. Terry Schiavo ring a bell or memory of a goldfish again? The judiciary certainly interprets the law and that is exactly what I am talking about. See the 14th amendment for why separate but equal does not work. Judges are not subservient to the people. The founders did not intend them to sway their interpretation of the law with the will of the people which is why they are appointed for life terms. Read your history as this can be found in the Federalist papers you so cite.



You are trying to be clever by changing the meaning of my analysis in regards to judiciary responsibilities.

I clearly stated that:

Quote:

The Judiciary was created to interpret and uphold law. Laws are created by our legislators whom represent the "will of the people". Judges are subservient to the "will of the people" as it is writ.




I did not mention nor insinuated that "to sway their (Judges) interpretation of the law with the will of the people". I was pretty clear that judiciary responsibilities include interpretation and to uphold the law, legislators write the law on behalf of the people. Nice try

So you agree mob rule was never the intention of the bill of rights? Also since you read the 14th amendment you would concede that your view on social programs is anti-14th amendment, as is prop 8?

Which I stated here:

Quote:

Your assumption was that I was pro prop-8 because you are quick to judge. I was just merely explaining how a system based on preferential treatment condones discrimination, while showing a double standard. Prop 8 is an example of this mob ruled discrimination that I speak of.