1. wtf does one have to do with the other? go fish (ps: the negativity is generated because these things happen in real life, not because I post about them)
Maybe this is indeed why I have the hardest time 'digesting' you're backing of Obama. Because of your failure to grasp one of his key concepts behind his campaign, its much easier to see you as a Hillary camper. I suppose its necessary to point out that you'd help Obama's cause far more by touting his strengths than pointing out the weaknesses of the Republican party. For those of us here who could be fence sitters, you're galvanizing support against your causes rather than for them.
2. I don't exclusively bash Republicans. There are a lot of Democratic enablers of Republicans I dislike as well.
Its quite possible that you do shed light on Democrats that are running afoul, but I don't really care to dig them up. Fact is, its like finding a needle in a haystack of anti-Republican posts. Once again, I turn back to the fact that positive headlines are perhaps more crucial to furthering a pro-Democratic agenda than simply making the Republicans out to be the meanies.
3. (haha you can't count) I don't really see this as 2 sides. You do I guess. I only speak for myself.
First off, thank you for pointing out my numerical mistake. Its been fixed! I'm going out on a limb (opinion) but I believe you're a 'dyed in the wool' Democrat. Why? You don't really seem to subscribe to any other frame of mind and that seems to be supported by the fact that you never undermine the Democrats while unceasingly propogating anti-Republican views. I guess you can say you 'speak' for yourself, but you're obviously not doing a lot of speaking. You primarily pick and choose headlines from your authoritative sources to do your talking. I do agree with you that there are far more than 2 sides, but from your standpoint, its pretty black and white.
4. What does saving American lives have to do with posting newsworthy stories on the internet? You are thinking small with the limited set of information which you can barely digest.
I suppose you really didn't like the previous question or else it wouldn't have generated such a nonchalant answer. If I was thinking small, you certainly 'one upped' me with that answer. Its about time you took a look in the mirror and faced yourself for what you are; a Democrat. Nothing wrong with this, mind you, but you're NOT a source for interesting news, outside of your own head, here on the LoD forums. I need to, once again, reiterate this: You have not gotten the kind of support from this community that would promote the continuation of your efforts to "post newsworthy stories". Its not newsworthy to us. Its little more than smear tactics usually and when not smearing Republicans, you do little more than post leftist issues that most here find little ground for agreement. If there is something I cannot 'digest' its lack of being upfront for what you believe in and promoting it in a positive fashion. You do neither of these things. Stretch, I'll never call you stupid, but I can easily call you shortsighted and askew of the big picture. You're not even inline with the 'camp' you claim.
Start being more positive and self effacing when engendering your views. Obama could genuinely use the support of a person such as you, but if you continue in the fashion you've previously employed, its going to be a tough road to hoe.
