I don't see how you've discredited Gore. You simply haven't made a scientific assertion about his carbon footprint, you just made some bs up about how you don't believe.
Horseshit. I gave you specific definitions to terms being used by the Gore camp. These definitions, if you even read them, were twisted and wildly exaggerated to form a basis on claiming Gore has a "Carbon Neutral Footprint", I used/linked actual sites you use on a minute by minute basis to establish your debate on these forums. I established my arguement based on facts and definition. You have based your logic on a buzz word for planting trees.
Claiming that I made something up and then trying to discredit me because your stance on this debate has no arguement is highly typical of someone who has no passion in what they are debating. You have lost this one a few posts back my friend. I never established myself as the expert here, but if really want to understand what my company and many fortune 500's are doing about the very thing you claim makes my arguements weak, I suggest you research the Sustainable Packaging Coalition. My company is a member working with many companies like Coca-Cola, Unilever, Starbucks, Johnson & Johnson etc on true cradle to grave green initiatives.
Wait a minute...maybe I am the expert? <img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif" alt="" />
Here is the bait..
Is calling me Mr. Polymerization a way to discredit my arguements because I sell 4.9 million pounds of petroleum based plastic films per month
Hook, line, and sinker
