Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 681
RETIRED
*
Offline
RETIRED
*
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 681
i dont really care who is president. in my day to day life, the president of the united states has absolutely no effect on me. never has, never will.
my issue with that statement is pretty blatant. I've heard, for the last 3 months, practically every fucking day, about how bush can protect us, blah blah....guess what? if there is another attack on US Soil the redicule is indeed warranted.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Offline
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
He's saying that he will blame Bush and everyone will be sorry for electing him when the Terrorists strike again, and the double standard is, although this may be true, if Kerry was in office, and the same thing happened, he wouldn't be treated the same? That's called a double standard, kthx.
Quote:
Sort of like people still believe that there was a connection between 9/11 and Iraq.

There is, it's been proven over and over. Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi intelligent services prior to the 9/11 attacks, on top of that Zarqwari is an Al Queada Terrorists from Jordan who is the main man in Iraq. Al Queada + Al Zarqwari + Iraq = connection.
Quote:
I believe Kerry would kill terrorists as well or better than Bush can.

No one said he wouldn't, but the fact remains, Bush has proven he will do this. But don't you see you're argueing the fact that if we get attacked while Bush is in office, it will be 100% his fault and everyone will hate him. But on the other hand you're argueing that if Kerry was in office and the same thing happened, that the american ppl wouldn't blame him, in fact the liberals are so narrow minded , even if Kerry was in office and we got attacked, they'd still blame Bush. Just get over it, we won, stop crying.


A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
9/11 and iraq are related strictly because of the fact that i highly doublt we would have gone to iraq if 9/11 didnt happen. It would have been a lot harder for bush to rally people to war without a motive whatsoever, he used 9/11 to go to war and do what he did in iraq. Right or wrong.
btw i voted bush and im proud of it.

[LoD]Pearl #173344 11/03/04 06:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Offline
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
Quote:
I've heard, for the last 3 months, practically every fucking day, about how bush can protect us, blah blah if there is another attack on US Soil the redicule is indeed warranted.

But see for the last 3 months Kerry has been saying the same thing, so in essence you're speaking in general that any president will have to be at fault for anything that happens to the US right? Not just Bush right?


#173345 11/03/04 06:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,402
J
Hypocrite
**
Offline
Hypocrite
**
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,402
Seriously, you losers are pathetic.
Do you know how much of a whining crybaby you look like now?
The people have spoken, now kiss the ring, bitch.
<img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
[
Lord of Emo
**
Offline
Lord of Emo
**
[
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,461
I never said I wouldn't blame Kerry or Bush... AGAIN, that's not the point. I believe that it is unrealistic to claim you can prevent all terrorism. That was their claim and people believed it. That's all Pearl was saying.
You're right, Iraq and Al Qaeda did communicate. And were soundly told to get the fuck out by the Iraqi government. Just because there are Al Qaeda members living in Iraq doesn't mean there is a connection. Using that logic, we should pretty much take out every country in the world. Was Iraq a minor threat? Sure, but I find it silly that every country in the surrounding area had weapon programs except Iraq. The disarming was working. Iraq was an illogical target, they wanted to go there even before 9/11. Bomb the Saudis for fucks sake, id actually buy that.
How has Bush proven he can fight terrorism? He had OsamaBL(the #1 terrorist in the world) in his fingertips, and let him go.. Because he(gwb) is affectively breeding new terrorists in the middle east? People around the world don't understand USAs motives. They fear we're like a machine, who can stride around the globe destroying things. Hell I saw on MSNBC or whatever bullshit media station I was watching that said the American public thinks that we are less safe because we invaded Iraq(or no more safe than before). The war on terror didn't elect GWB. It was the moral crusaders, the religious, the fanatical Jesus lovers who won it for him. People who put issues like gay marrage above the economy, science, choice and terrorism, fucking biggots. Am I disappointed because Bush won? Yeah I am. Is it much of a surprise that people are still talking about politics after the election? Ya normally after elections people just go back under their rock and the world starts spinning again and the sun comes out. Heavens forbid that I dissent after my guys lose.

[LoD]plexx #173347 11/03/04 06:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Offline
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
Quote:
I believe that it is unrealistic to claim you can prevent all terrorism. That was their claim and people believed it.

Pullleeease, no one expects there to be a 100% terrosist eradication, no one claimed that, and if they did, of course it wouldn't be realistic, that's just logical.
It's time to get off the soap box and stop trying to convince yourself that we're not safe because Bush is in office. If the people felt otherwise, Kerry would be in office today. It's time to get over it, Bush till 2008.


[LoD]Torak #173348 11/03/04 06:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,433
Lord
***
Offline
Lord
***
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,433
This second term bush needs to stop fucking around and get osama. Get one objective accomplished before you start another. If he does not succeed in getting osama or redirects efforts elsewhere hes going to go down as a flop in the books.
He also needs to get his head out of his ass with the religious shit. I voted for bush (I knew kerry would take cali though so that didnt matter) but the religious decision making shit without reason because thats what "he" beleives has got to go.
good luck to him.

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,433
Lord
***
Offline
Lord
***
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,433
NT

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Offline
Lord Of Consciousness
*****
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,275
I understand, you'll get over it soon...boo <img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> hoo


Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 36 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 36 (0.005s) Memory: 11.7916 MB (Peak: 18.3042 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-06-16 04:53:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS