Lords of Death Forums Lords of Death Forums LoD General Discussion Snuffel Upagus

Ok so what are you trying to imply in that last statement?

Wow, that is the dumbest thing I have read, even dumber then the IRAQ HAD EXPLOSIVES argument last week.
Point being fool, is your A #1 JOE pres there took his eye off the prize. Instead of killing Bin Laden he took the war to a 2nd front.

You just flamed the fans of hate, and sure right now you may feel safer, but your millitary is weaker, you've proven you can't nation build worth shit, and your over priced, high tech weaponary fails in guerilla wars... way to go. Your going to get yours again, when you think your the safest. And Canada will probably be right with you is getting hit.
You surely left highschool to soon if under geo-political tom foolery you think attacking Iraq has made you safer.
$ cost of wars, deaths of Americans, polarizing of your nation, pissnig off radical muslims [ not just Bin LAdens crew ] world wide, splittering national friendships, and MUCH more.
The world outside of america is much worse off now then before with your 2 little wars, and no matter what level of RAR RAR RAR GO USA you can throw on it inside the USA the rest of the world looks at it as assissine reasoning to go to war for WMD, wait no Bin Laden links, wait no Freedom, wait no USA safety [ wtf ever it is this week] .

fuck radical muslims.
muja you never answered my questions on the other thread.
If i give someone a gunand pay them to kill that little nurse of yours that works in St/ Joes hospital, and they do, Would you hold me responsible for his actions?
its a pretty simple yes or no question.

I did answer them
I said no no no, to look, and after that you then made a replay as to not understanding American vaules.
My wife [ american ] don't think that way, nor do alot of people [ americans ] I know. Same as not all Canadians think the way I do. Its just the way we rationalize our vaules.
So go look again.
I stated NO if you didn't see that in this post and the other,
** edit here **
PS Sinbad, with your reasoning ,every iraqi killed or afghan person then should want to kill you and bush for killing their people and relatives. After all the PEOPLE of afghanistan for the most part probably had never even heard or knew of Bin Laden.

i know your smarter than doing that. and yes i do remeber you answered them questions now. It is really a shame that you can't hold people responsible for their actions. God help you if your ever in a car accident and find out that the tire blew because of a defect, and it killed your wife. because acording to your thinking, if the tire company knew the tires were faulty, they have no accountability for you having them on your car because YOU choose to drive on them.
nice arguement

God help you if you ever have children, and your son or daughter overdoses on crack cocaine. because according to your thinking, the person who gave them the drugs isnt accountable for the death of your child, because it was your child who decided to use the drugs.

and to think that afghans don't know who bin-ladin is? you really cant be that stupid. Should they blame someone? yeah, they should blame the terrorists that created the unfortuante collateral damage that happens in war. Next your goign to say that OBL didnt mean to kill anyone, he just wanted to disrupt our economy. grow a spine.

i think our armed forces are fine. Face it No matter how streched out we are NO other country cant bring a force over our boarders. Sept the mexicans. There is no threat sept gurilla tactics which those kinds of people are dieing in iraq blowing them selves up, and are not here in the US killing us :+_) GO bush !