Lords of Death Forums Lords of Death Forums LoD General Discussion At Least Bush has Balls!

After all these years you're still a tree hugging democrat clone? =(
You actually were "attempting" to prop yourself up (notice how I put attempting in quotes)and put yourself above everyone with your perfect idealogy to go along with your perfect education and completely accurate plans for our future. Standard liberal spin. You try and slyly say that you're better than everyone but I see right through your bullshit and you know it, you're a fake dude, you're as transparent as the window I'm looking out of right now. The only thing you hit on the head was that you think you know all and that your way is the right way, and anyone who opposes you must be a Talk Radio junkie with no education and no bearing on direction in life, you're a joke.
And you say someone with a Talk show radio degree (or whatever lame interpretation you try to give conservatives) would have a hard time convincing you. Well no shit dude, you're impossible to convince of anything, LOL, let's be real dude, you can't be convinced of anything unless it was to say that Democrats and the Liberal ideaology is the only way to live, anything contrary to that view and your thinking cap turns off, and tunnel vision kicks in. I'm right , you're wrong, I'm smart, you're not, I'm the best, you're not, sound familiar? this is your mantra throughout most of your posts, if you disagree, do a search for your own posts, I just choose not to waste time pointing out the obvious, so look it up yourself.
There really is no need for us to continue this thread, you and I go in circles everytime we do this, we should just save our energy.

Charles manson has balls too, and he believed everything he believed in too.
Same can be said for Yassar Arafat, Adolf Hitler, Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu, John Wayne Gacy, Kin Jong, Stalin, Pol Pot, Osama Bin Laden, Castro, Robert Mugabe and Idi Amin among others.
You are a follower of some very dynamic people, based on your criteria for whom you admire.

You're wrong about the difference between us that you cited. Anyone who cannot admit they're wrong has too much of an ego. I am wrong a shit load and definitely admit it and have on many occasions. If someone brings up a good point that is worthy of being recognized that contradicts something that I believe, I have no choice but to accept it, which I do. I agree also, I want both sides of the story so I can make up my own mind, so I'm always motivated to learn more about something I'm ignorant about.
I noticed you must have edited your response cuz now I'm a weed smoking moonflower hippie instead of just a weed smoking hippie, was it really worth adding your own manifestation of self? I have plenty of liberal ideals also, pro choice, pro environment, pro decriminlizing victimless crimes, I just hate liberal social policies more than anything, so deal with it.
Go stick your dick in a tree and hug it tightly and sing "we are the world".

Well no shit. You forgot Alexander, Hannibal, Nero, Napolean, Patton, Che, Rommel, etc.
The point I was making was that Bush is actually addressing the problem with terrorism in the world, which every one else has been ignoring(including the US) for the last 20-30 yrs. The Liberals just roll over and blame the US for all the world's problems. I'll fight a more sensitive war on terrorism.

That is not true sir. That is a one sided, blind statement. The world has not ignored terrorism. Just the states. Ireland , Solmalia , shit name a country in the last 100 years that has not been struck. Just that Bush invaded 2 countrys, killed 1000's , about probably 20x that of 9/11 in order to stop the terrorism, which really just caused more World Wide, gave the US a bad name, and #1 didn't so much as sniff Bin Ladens body odor.

Dudes, both S and T ,chill with the post towards each other, and just post topic related stories. Your both right on issues. I see you getting caught up on the he said she said shit.

Bash me instead <img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

Never once in my post did I ever mention the validity of the opinions. There is no reach in logic on my part, because I am not arguing whether someone's opinion is right or wrong.
All I was saying is that just because someone has a different opinion than you, it does not make them (or you) an idiot. That is all.
If you insist on taking this further, I will ban you! <img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
-Bal.

hitler had "ball" (only 1)

You obviously missed the entire point of my ramble or i didnt get the point to you clear enough. My opinion of bush doesnt matter and i said regardless of who was in office i think things would have gone the same way. I never claimed to be the leader of a free country and i pointed that out in the fact when i asked the question of maybe thats why were typing here on this forum instead of in office. I dont think bush is a tart for not making everyone happy. I think bush is a tart for other reasons. You can see my opinion of gore and kerry in there also. If you werent acting on such a hard core rep side you would have seen that just cause i feel 1 way about a pres i dont thik the alts are the greatest thinkg ever. You took everything i said out of contexts and made it look like just cause of the state everything is in i think im smarter then he is. I also pointed out the fact another pres prob wouldnt do much because America has and always will, a fickle economy and everyone couple years needs change. Even if i was to say i was/wasnt a republican or demo(which i cant because i share views from both sides) i still think bush can be an idiot. Regardless no pres in the history of america has ever made a decision that made everyone happy.

he's a fictional character that the govt created to put a face on terrorism. proof will come in time, when "he" is never caught.
the US didn't care about terrorism as much before 9/11. basically that's how the rest of the world is, so why should we be any different? the rest of the world operates under the notion of: we don't help others until we are fucked with. the US was just following suit, I don't see anything wrong with that. every country in the world hates us, until they need help (MONEY, basically).
world peace will never happen, what bush SHOULD have done, was take that 100billion plus dollars (wasted on a shithole like Iraq) and built a barricade in the oceans, around the US. build up the factories and industries for items generally imported into the US, and cut off the rest of the world. let those fucks in Europe decide for themselves who gets to stay and who gets to go.
i've got 200,000$US that says france would be the first country to fall.