Couls,
Feel free to review the source of the article and make your own decision on it's veracity, but do not question my intelligence for posting information that may not make it through the corporate controlled mainstream media. Criticizing people who seek out other sources of information goes against the very priciples that America was founded on. I suppose you would prefer an America where we all quietly consumed the crap shoveled into our maws by Foxnews, MSNBC and the New York Post. At least then you wouldn't have anyone to disent against your worldview.
As I've said before we all should take whatever information is available to us and filter it based on the quality of the source, and the proof provided by the article.
I too am concerned about the use of unamed sources, but to be honest, I'm not surprised that the sources in this article preferred to remain unnamed. Any individuals who have come out against this administration (Paul O'neil, Richard Clark, General Anthony Zini, Ambassador WIlson), have been attacked, disparaged, in Wilson's case had his wife put in danger.
I can't even count how many times this administration has quoted "unnamed sources" as proof for their policy decisions. This administration does not have a leg to stand on when it comes to using imperfect information. Guys like you are more than willing to jump into a war that has caused the deaths of over 700 American's on the basis of a forged uranium order, but when it comes to unverified information about the President you are up in arms.
Let's see how this story plays out, but I think there is more here than you think.