Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Ainr #150470 06/08/04 12:17 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,402
J
Hypocrite
**
Offline
Hypocrite
**
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,402
To the liberal press every war is Vietnam, or in the predictions made for Baghdad, Stalingrad.
And if events don't turn out as bad as they hope, they do their best to put a bad light on it. If it's not Vietnam, they will do their best to make it Vietnam.
We conquered an entire country and have held it under our grasp for over a year, all with about 800 deaths.
Put that into perspective. On D-Day alone, we lost something like 6,000 people.
This war has been a victory pretty much unprecedented in human history. But you won't hear that on CNN or ABC.


Jobu #150471 06/08/04 02:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
OP Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Either you are playing the game of deliberate mis-interpretation, or I was not too clear on my analogy, or you are not the bright.
Not sure which fits....but none-the-less you totally missed the point by 182452342342 miles.
Gratz, keep the spin goin.....spin....spin...spin.....avoid...avoid....avoid.....spin.....
ya crack me up.




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
[LoD]Arioch #150472 06/08/04 04:15 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,402
J
Hypocrite
**
Offline
Hypocrite
**
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,402
You bore me with your pathetic attempts at political debate.
If you are going to try being funny with an analogy, make sure it fits and is not so easily shot down. Don't blame me for your own weak argument.
Our soldiers on D-Day were fighting the same fight our soldiers are fighting today. It's Democracy vs Totalitarianism. It's the same fight we've been in for the last 100 years.
Whether that fight is against Hitler or Saddam doesn't matter. They both needed to go.
But you won't get any historical perspective from the liberal media. All you'll get is the sensationalism of a car bomb. They'll report every major, minor, and imagined setback while nearly never reporting on the successes.
Welcome to the 5th column.


Jobu #150473 06/08/04 05:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
Lord of Cruelty
**
OP Offline
Lord of Cruelty
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,850
For letting me know you missed the point.
Good god you are a thin skulled creature.




"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" Einstein.
Jobu #150474 06/08/04 05:16 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,157
M
Camel Humper
**
Offline
Camel Humper
**
M
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,157
No Jobu your entirely wrong sir. Hilter was born of his own people, was not PUT in place by the Brittish and US forces in the 80's, supplied by US forces with Chemical and Bio weapons and told to fight Iran. Hilter was a man who rose to power within Austria and Germany and then attacked other nations as part of his plan. Many nations, with a clear agenda to dispose of one race. Sadam just had power, and wanted to keep it. Contra scandal remember what that was ?
This fight is not even a nation vs a nation .. D-Day was the world divided into sides fighting. This is one Nation invading 2 nations for the sole purpose of protecting at best ITSELF, and at worst its own power interests.


"Whats bred in the bone, cannot be bred out" - Robertson Davies
Jobu #150475 06/08/04 05:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,157
M
Camel Humper
**
Offline
Camel Humper
**
M
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,157
Sure the 1000's of iraqis that have died for your cause will agree with you on that. O and for the probably next 50 years of instablility also, just so the WORLD can be a safer place. I am sure the people in South America feel all nice and safe since Sadam is gone, he woulda taken out the people of Brazil right after the US, Russia, Brittian and the 20 or so other countries he knew could kick his countries ass after 10 years of sanctions and a war from the previous Bush that emlinated his army to a token shell of iteself. WOW what a threat. Now if you say he was a threat since HE could MAY have been able to lanuch bio and chem weapons then you have about 30 more countries in the same boat, and now probably a 1000 more cells world wide that can and want to do it. Safe my ass.


"Whats bred in the bone, cannot be bred out" - Robertson Davies
Mujahedeen #150476 06/08/04 07:04 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 143
Virakar Akar'akt
*
Offline
Virakar Akar'akt
*
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 143
Mad props to Truman, that mofo had the balls to drop a nuclear weapon. Would you have made the same decision? Lord knows I would have had trouble doing it.
And before anybody just says "hell yes I would have" you need to put it into perspective: those bombs killed thousands of people, civilians mind you, in one stroke. That is a lot of weight to carry.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 20 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 30 (0.007s) Memory: 11.6278 MB (Peak: 12.8036 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-29 15:27:05 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS