Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 8,601
[
Lord of Controversy
***
OP Offline
Lord of Controversy
***
[
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 8,601


Click to reveal..
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,425
G
Jilted Ex-GF Who Ignores Restraining Order
*
Offline
Jilted Ex-GF Who Ignores Restraining Order
*
G
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,425


Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,176
Member
***
Offline
Member
***
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,176
The touchscreen needs re-calibration.... if they were to touch the name under Obama, then Obama would have been checked. It's not changing the vote - it's registering the touch in the wrong spot on the screen. But hey, anything that looks like someone is trying to cheat is news.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,811
The Angry Mythbuster
**
Offline
The Angry Mythbuster
**
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,811
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Goldmund]The touchscreen needs re-calibration.... if they were to touch the name under Obama, then Obama would have been checked. It's not changing the vote - it's registering the touch in the wrong spot on the screen. But hey, anything that looks like someone is trying to cheat is news.


Actually, this machine didn't have a calibration issue. It was just straight up defective and had to be pulled. Every button worked normal except for Obama, if it was a calibration issue then every button would be the equal distance off. It's explained in the comments section directly under the video.


Quote:
. Being a software developer, I immediately went into troubleshoot mode. I first thought the calibration was off and tried selecting Jill Stein to actually highlight Obama. Nope. Jill Stein was selected just fine. Next I deselected her and started at the top of Romney's name and started tapping very closely together to find the 'active areas'. From the top of Romney's button down to the bottom of the black checkbox beside Obama's name was all active for Romney. From the bottom of that same checkbox to the bottom of the Obama button (basically a small white sliver) is what let me choose Obama. Stein's button was fine. All other buttons worked fine.

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 23
[
Initiate
Offline
Initiate
[
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 23
Originally Posted By: [LoD
Rainman]

Actually, this machine didn't have a calibration issue. It was just straight up defective and had to be pulled. Every button worked normal except for Obama, if it was a calibration issue then every button would be the equal distance off. It's explained in the comments section directly under the video.


From what I remember it was indeed a calibration issue and was put back after being recalibrated.

There are two main types of touchscreens, resistive and capacitive. What you said is true of capacitive touchscreens- if it's off, everything is off. This is the type of touchscreen you will find on tablets, phones, etc.

The voting machine, however, was a resistive touchscreen. This is a more durable type of touchscreen, but is also more prone to errors. In a resistive screen, each section needs to be calibrated individually. The fact that it was only off on that particular section means that more than likely it just wasn't calibrated correctly.

Of course from what I heard the precinct staff didn't respond very well, but that's a different matter entirely. I think this situation is best left to Hanlon and Occam's razors. If you really wanted to cheat, wouldn't you just have the machine display Obama's vote and give the actual vote to Romney?

Last edited by [LoD]Magnus; 11/09/12 09:05 PM.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 9 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.010s Queries: 25 (0.004s) Memory: 11.5931 MB (Peak: 12.8038 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-04-22 17:14:21 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS