Lords of Death Forums Lords of Death Forums LoD General Discussion Bush Losing It?

By enough said I assume you mean that I am intelligent, well read, well educated, and well hung?

That way we wouldn't have to deal with young ignorant morons always giving their useless opinion.
Plus we wouldn't have to look at their ugly fucking mugshots they post either.

Its 100% true. I know !!!

Tich everyone should do exactly what you say and go find there own information, then decide what is fact or not. But by posting this article here you do the opposite. I'll explain..
If you wanted to post this article where you believed some or most of it to be true, you should of verified it first. Then come to us with a short summary of why you believe it to be true and the facts that support your opinion. Since you did not its strictly one thing, BULLSHIT. You knew it was BULLSHIT when you posted it, you still know its BULLSHIT or you would of come out and researched it for yourself.
Articles like the above from sources like the above publication never have anything more than "SPIN" in there stories. Its worse than getting a Politically sided view from CNN, FoxNews, etc because from those sources of news you can easily verify what is fact and what is an editorial. Just reading the first few lines where the writer discusses the Presidents use of foul language to his staff members is enough BULLSHIT for me to stop reading and write the whole article off. You can see how unprofessional the article is written and its clearly political hate.
Im interested Tich in you showing me an article where this administration threatened the life or to harm this Ambassadors wife. I'll go look for it now but I doubt that its anything more than you reading some more of this writers BS and believing it to be fact. If your speaking about her being put in danger because she was outted as a CIA operative and you feel G W Bush new about it and willing let it leak out..thats another debate all together.
Everyone needs to wake the fuck up and make a decision for themselves based on the facts.
Shit I don't agree at all with Arioch or Stretch about politics but at least I know that when they post an article they have done enough homework to show me its worth reading and making a decision on.

W'04

Kerry for president!

from websters.
Stupid: Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
Yeah, you're stupid.
congrats <img src="/~stretch/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

I wouldn't put faith into it as an unnamed source, jsut like I put no faith into the "nigeria uranium" claim, the WMD launch in 45 minutes", "15,000 tons of VX" or the "Al Queda - Iraq" link that were all peddled as "legitimate" sources. Oddly our conservative compatriots defended these claims with all they could.
Anyone should question an unnamed source.
I am glad to see the conservatives question something, I just wish they wouldn't be so selective on blind obedience, and questioning. They are very selective on which "unnamed sources" are to be believed 100% and which to be believe 0%. Oddly those decisions fall on party lines, coincidence?
If the man is that out of it, I would suspect that it would have gotten leaked and be out in the open sooner. That is too over the top behaviourwise to stay under wraps this long. It would have leaked in one of the many anti-bush books by now.
I say Greenspan for Prez '04. If not him, then Mr. T.

Kerry, do my eyes bleed ?

w3rd!